Markets Stocks Economy Crypto Earnings Banking Energy
Home› Tech› Feature
Tech · Exclusive

Meta's Muse hits 10.8M downloads, but costs loom over earnings

Meta's Muse hits 10.8M downloads, but costs loom over earnings
Tech · 2026
Photo · Eleanor Whitfield for Daily Digest Invest
By Eleanor Whitfield Markets Editor-in-Chief Oct 15, 2026 4 min read

Meta's new AI assistant, Muse, is climbing the app charts at a rapid pace, but the real test for investors comes later this month when the company reports earnings. Analysts estimate that Muse has been downloaded 10.8 million times since its launch, a strong start for a product that could shape Meta's future in artificial intelligence. However, the buzz around downloads is giving way to a more sobering question: how much does Muse cost to run, and can it eventually pay for itself?

What's happening with Muse?

According to analysts at UBS, citing data from app-tracking firm Apptopia, Muse had reached about 10.8 million cumulative downloads by October 13th. The app has also held a top spot on the US iOS App Store since late September, indicating strong consumer interest. For a company that has been investing heavily in AI, these numbers are encouraging. But as any seasoned investor knows, downloads don't equal profits.

Muse is Meta's answer to the growing wave of AI assistants, a category that includes chatbots and digital helpers that can answer questions, generate content, or assist with tasks. The app's rapid adoption suggests that Meta has successfully captured user attention, but the company now faces the challenge of turning that attention into revenue. AI assistants are expensive to operate, requiring vast computing power and ongoing development, and Meta has not yet revealed how it plans to monetize Muse.

Why investors are watching the October 21st earnings

Meta is scheduled to report its third-quarter earnings on October 21st, and investors will be listening for any clues about Muse's costs and monetization strategy. The company has been spending heavily on AI infrastructure, including data centers and chip development, and the launch of Muse adds another layer of expense. While Meta has a history of launching products that eventually generate significant revenue, the timeline for Muse's profitability remains unclear.

For context, Meta's core advertising business remains its primary revenue driver, and AI is increasingly being used to improve ad targeting and content recommendations. Muse could eventually integrate with Meta's platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram, to enhance user engagement and open new advertising opportunities. But that integration is not yet apparent, and the immediate financial impact of Muse is likely to be a drag on margins.

Investors have seen this pattern before with other tech giants. Companies often launch popular consumer products that initially lose money, betting that they will eventually become profitable through advertising, subscriptions, or other revenue streams. The key question for Meta is whether Muse can follow that path or whether it will remain a costly experiment.

What it means for investors

For everyday investors, the rise of Muse is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it shows that Meta can still innovate and attract users, which is a positive signal for the company's long-term growth. On the other hand, the costs associated with running an AI assistant could weigh on Meta's earnings in the near term. The October 21st report will provide a clearer picture of how much Meta is spending on AI and whether management has a concrete plan to make Muse profitable.

Investors should also consider the broader context. Meta is not the only company pouring money into AI; competitors like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon are doing the same. The race to dominate AI is expensive, and the payoff is uncertain. For Meta, the success of Muse could be a key differentiator, but it is still early days.

As the earnings date approaches, watch for any comments from Meta's leadership about user engagement, monetization experiments, or cost controls. These will be the most telling indicators of whether Muse is a promising investment or just a costly distraction.

In the meantime, investors can look at other market developments for context. For instance, Berkshire's recent investment in a tech firm highlights the ongoing interest in AI-related companies, while energy stocks continue to climb despite mixed oil prices, showing that markets are still finding opportunities beyond tech.

Ultimately, the Muse story is a reminder that in the world of tech investing, popularity doesn't always translate into profits. The October 21st earnings will be a critical moment for Meta shareholders, and the details about Muse's costs and monetization will be closely scrutinized.

More from this story

Next article · Don't miss

UBS: Spectrum Brands' turnaround is cheaper than the market thinks

UBS argues Spectrum Brands' share price assumes its turnaround stalls, with profits stuck near recent lows. But improving pet care trends and easing pressure in home and garden could support a stronger recovery than the market expects.

Read the story →
UBS: Spectrum Brands' turnaround is cheaper than the market thinks